The Pumpkinhead remake might not totally suck

Back in 2014 I reported that the Motion Picture Corporation of America (MPCA) was looking to reboot Stan Winston’s 1988 directorial debut Pumpkinhead—fast forward two years and we finally have an update on the remake thanks to Saw executive producer Peter Block, who shares some promising words. While Pumpkinhead itself is one of the most underrated horror movies to come out of the ’80s—it’s a genuinely fun, atmospheric monster movie—the sequels it spawned have to be some of the worst movies in any franchise ever. The bar is set pretty fucking low, guys.

In a recent interview, Block shared some details on the remake and his approach to Winston’s classic, pointing out that it’s not going to be a shot-for-shot remake, but instead an expanded version of the original.

“There is a similarity of theme and a similarity of story. There’s a lot of Easter eggs for people who know the original — iconic shots and iconic lines that we’re going to use. But we’ve enhanced the setting, and we’ve expanded the characters somewhat, to give it a different kind of experience.”

The best remakes (in my opinion) are the ones that take a concept and spin it in such a way that make it feel unique, while still holding onto the spirit of the original, and it sounds like Block is doing exactly that with Pumpkinhead. It’s a fascinating world, grounded by a terrifying monster, so I love the idea of them expanding that universe and giving us a new perspective on the classic. But even then, the movie will only ever be as good as its monster, and we all shared the same concern: will it be practical effects or a CGI turd?

“I am a big proponent of practical effects. That was the great thing about the original. A lot of the films I still respond to most today, it’s because of the practical effects. We think that it’s going to be a nice slow reveal, lots of scares and lots of action in the beginning, and a great creature in the end, which everybody should be able to look at and say, ‘Oh, that’s Pumpkinhead!’ It’s not like you’re all of a sudden going to find that it’s some amorphous, nebulous, CGI wispy thing. You’re going to know it came from the Pumpkinhead family lineage.”

While we’re still a ways out from seeing the film (they plan to shoot early next year), we now have a reason to actually be excited about this thing, which might not actually suck after all.

Source: EW

Posted by

If you are ever attacked by a gorilla just sit back and relax while you enjoy the once in a life time feeling of your limbs being ripped off.

4 thoughts on “The Pumpkinhead remake might not totally suck

  1. Man, there are some franchises that had a decent start and then just spiraled into disaster. I have never actually seen this (as far as I know), and none of the sequels. Maybe I should check out the original and then just wait on the remake!

    1. Yeah, it’s unfortunate that most franchises crash and burn more often than they don’t. The original is fun and very underrated, definitely worth a look!

  2. Good point re: a film is only as good as its monster. The monster in the original film looks pretty formidable!

    I say this based on the trailer you posted. Truthfully, I hadn’t even heard of the film or its sequels, but it looks like the original has some clever cinematography.

    1. The original film is pretty great and totally underrated, especially considering it was Stan Winston’s directing debut. Definitely check it out if you ever get the chance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.